๐Ÿ’€ RIP WAR ON CANCER 1971-2025 ๐Ÿ’€

Trumpโ€™s hit job on cancer research grants reads like satire, except patients paid the price.

The New York Times showed how his administration froze or axed studies because they dared to mention equity, LGBTQ health, or racial disparities. Courts already ruled some of these cuts illegal. That means discrimination wasnโ€™t a side effect. It was the policy.

Cancer research lives and dies on NIH grants. A single award funds years of lab work, salaries, and trial prep. Pull that midstream and you donโ€™t โ€œsave money.โ€ You destroy careers, dismantle labs, and strand patients waiting on clinical trials. Once you scatter a team, the science is gone. You canโ€™t reassemble a decade of work like Lego bricks.

NIH anchors global cancer research. When ideology hijacks that pipeline, the fallout isnโ€™t abstract. Fewer therapies, more disparities, and an exodus of talent. Americaโ€™s reputation as the worldโ€™s leader in biomedical science gets auctioned off to score cheap political points.

Patients get collateral damage while politicians pose for cameras.

The cruelty is blatant. Cancer doesnโ€™t care if your grant mentions โ€œequity.โ€ Yet politicians shredded entire programs over buzzwords. Thatโ€™s not governance. Thatโ€™s vandalism dressed up as oversight. Every cut landed on real people, not line items.

Imagine if patients organized the way industries do. Why is there no cancer lobby. Suppose the day comes when patients stop begging for scraps and act like a constituency.

If this hits home, toss it a like, a repost, comment, or tag someone you may be ambivalent about. One click makes a bigger difference than you think.

SOURCE โžก๏ธ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/magazine/cancer-research-grants-funds-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.mE8.W_KQ.9c4XJXhVYANG&smid=url-share

Previous
Previous

Introducing "Walk If Off: Men Don't Talk About Cancer"

Next
Next

Out of Patients EP413: Miss Diagnosed: Sophie Sargent